Amazon still hasn’t fixed its problem with bait-and-switch reviews

Our $24 drone. You can see the missing propeller on the right.
Enlarge / Our $24 drone. You can see the lacking propeller on the suitable.

Timothy B. Lee / Ars Technica

Like hundreds of different mother and father, I made a decision to get my children an inexpensive drone for Christmas. I spent $24 for a plastic flying machine with rudimentary collision-avoidance capabilities. A plastic cage largely stored small fingers away from the 4 propellers. The children had been delighted for the primary couple of hours.

Then my five-year-old daughter someway managed to get one of many propellers caught in her hair. The drone was by no means the identical after that. Instead of hovering within the air, it began veering crazily to 1 facet and falling to the ground. A few hours later, I observed that one other propeller—not the one which had grabbed my daughter’s hair—had fallen off solely. Now whenever you toss it up it instantly flips over and plunges to the ground.

The children loved the drone a lot in its few temporary hours of performance that I believed I’d purchase them one other one. (Hopefully this one would keep away from my daughter’s hair.) If I did extra analysis and spent a bit extra money, I hoped I may discover a higher-quality mannequin that would not collapse after a couple of hours.

So I went to, looked for “youngsters’s drone,” and sorted by “common buyer evaluation,” figuring the best-reviewed drones had been prone to be top quality. They weren’t.

“Absolutely love this honey”

The first results of my search was a $23 drone with 6,400 reviews and a formidable five-star common score. This appeared promising!

But then I really appeared on the five-star reviews.

This drone apparently has a
Enlarge / This drone apparently has a “great texture” and tastes nice.


“Absolutely love this honey,” wrote one reviewer within the UK in March 2019. “It’s fairly completely different from any supermarket-purchased honey I’ve tried.”

“If you are seeking to have a style of Greece with out making the journey, this honey does the trick,” wrote one other buyer the identical month. A 3rd buyer wrote in January 2019 that it was “darkish, luxurious pine honey, not too candy, completely incredible with strained Greek yoghurt and additional cream.”

When I sorted the reviews by date, I noticed that the newest reviewers really had purchased a drone they usually had been overwhelmingly not giving it 5 stars. “Bought this for my Grandson,” a buyer wrote on December 26. “He performed with it for two hours earlier than it broke and is not working.” He gave the drone one star.

But the older reviews had been for honey. Apparently, the producer had tricked Amazon into displaying hundreds of reviews for an unrelated product beneath its drone, serving to the drone to unfairly rise to the highest of Amazon’s search outcomes.

The story was comparable for the second and third leads to my drone search. Both had hundreds of reviews with five-star averages. In each circumstances, lots of the five-star reviews had been clearly for different merchandise—together with a bottle of vodka, a bracelet, and a field of Christmas playing cards.

In each circumstances, the newest reviews had been virtually all unfavorable reviews from prospects who had really purchased the drones. One reviewer claimed {that a} drone had scratched their son’s face.

This form of evaluation bait-and-switch is just not a brand new problem. More than two years in the past, Buzzfeed’s Nicole Nguyen wrote about different on-line sellers utilizing the identical rip-off. For instance, she discovered that lots of the five-star reviews for a highly-rated iPhone charging dock had been really reviews for a culinary torch.

“Amazon is sprinkled with different examples,” Nguyen wrote. “This iPhone X battery case itemizing was for a leather-based pockets telephone case. This iPhone battery case web page was previously an inventory for Lightning charging cables. This Wi-Fi router was beforehand listed as nano computer systems and has been amassing reviews since 2003. This neck brace was previously a bathe caddy itemizing. What was previously an inventory for a guitar-string motion gauge is a now a web page for magnetic, glue-free eyelashes.”

In an emailed assertion, an Amazon spokesman informed Ars that the bogus reviews I observed violated Amazon’s insurance policies.

“We have clear pointers about when merchandise must be grouped collectively and we have now guardrails in place to stop merchandise from being incorrectly grouped, both on account of human error or abuse,” the spokesperson wrote. “The element web page in query has been fixed, and we’re taking applicable motion on the dangerous actor.”

As a results of Amazon’s motion, the top-ranking drone, which beforehand had greater than 6,000 reviews, now has solely about 50 reviews and its star score has dropped to a few and a half stars. But the different two listings I discussed above—each of which I additionally talked about in a Monday electronic mail to Amazon—still have hundreds of constructive reviews, together with a bunch of clearly bogus ones.

Amazon’s strategy to third-party sellers is the other of buyer obsessed

Whatever motion Amazon in the end takes in opposition to these specific distributors Amazon’s broader efforts depart rather a lot to be desired. An organization should not have the ability to safe a high slot in search outcomes with such apparent subterfuge.

The top-reviewed drones in Amazon’s search outcomes got here from manufacturers with names that gave the impression to be chosen at random. My drone was made by “HONGXUNJIE.” Other highly-rated drones on Amazon are made by “SHWD,” “Taktoppy,” “SimileLine,” “Hffeeque,” “Mafix,” “MINOSNEO,” and so forth. Clicking on the names of those “manufacturers” takes you to a search end result with no extra data on who made these merchandise.

Amazon may simply require sellers to offer some primary transparency about these listings—disclosing the place these producers are situated, how lengthy they have been in enterprise, and which different manufacturers they personal. This would possibly make it simpler for Amazon to punish firms that attempt to mislead prospects with pretend reviews.

Major Internet firms usually insist that policing their platforms for misinformation is a logistically insurmountable job. This argument has no less than superficial plausibility for firms like Facebook and Twitter that must deal with billions of items of content material each week. But sustaining minimal requirements for Amazon product listings should not be so troublesome. Amazon is not simply itemizing data on its web site, it is providing a product on the market and taking a lower of the sale value. In many circumstances it is warehousing and transport the bodily merchandise.

The ensuing income ought to give Amazon ample sources to do primary vetting of product listings. Amazon in all probability cannot confirm each declare in a product itemizing, nevertheless it should not be arduous to detect when somebody takes an inventory for honey and converts it into an inventory for a drone. If it could actually’t be achieved algorithmically, Amazon can and will rent sufficient human beings to evaluation each vital change to product listings. It should not be attainable for somebody to vary an inventory for honey into an inventory for a drone with out anybody in Seattle noticing.

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos has lengthy claimed that his firm is laser-focused on serving the wants of consumers—a philosophy he calls “buyer obsession.” In some methods, Amazon has lived as much as its personal hype. Amazon presents low costs, a wide array, and quick, handy service. Amazon continues to get higher on all these fronts—simply this weekend I used to be in a position to pay an additional $3 to get same-day supply on a $9 merchandise.

But high quality can also be necessary to prospects, and right here Amazon appears to be something however customer-obsessed. Sometimes I need the most affordable product I can get. But different occasions I’m keen to pay additional to get one thing that may last more than a day and will not injure my youngsters. And for some product classes, Amazon’s web site makes it troublesome to find out which firms even have a monitor report of satisfying prospects.

Related posts

Rocket Report: Billionaire backs Scottish spaceport, Relativity bags a bundle


Another self-driving startup got gobbled up by incumbents


SpaceX says it will attempt Starship’s big hop on Tuesday


Lifting the VR veil: How PlayStation 5 works with Sony’s last-gen headset


“Locked” for 300 years: Virtual unfolding has now revealed this letter’s secrets


Virgin Galactic’s stock price drops following failed spaceflight attempt


Leave a Comment